ABOUT THE CONCEPT

To understand the Concept & Services of

Stolen????- where you can help yourself and others:

StolenKids- 4 Those losing kids due to 'authorities' ie Forced Adoption & Care!

GO TO http://stolenkids-bloggers.blogspot.com/ Or perhaps more suited to YOUR needs:

StolenChildhood- 4 those facing abuse past or present sexual or other!

GO TO http://stolenchildhood-bloggers.blogspot.com/ or

StolenTrust- 4 those where or have suffered abuse within a relationship!

GO TO http://StolenTrust-bloggers.blogspot.com/
or
StolenOyster- 4 those who have been abused or raped by a stranger or stalker

GO TO http://StolenOyster-bloggers.blogspot.com/

Pages

Monday, 24 January 2011

24-Jan-2011 - Daily Mail - Paedophile Snatcher sentenced

24-Jan-2011 - Daily Mail - Paedophile Snatcher sentenced

In my personal opinion woefully inadequately!

 
Paedophile snatched girl, 10, off street before abusing her in 'appalling act of sexual depravity'

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 4:25 PM on 24th January 2011

A man snatched a 10-year-old girl off the street and abused her shortly before taking his three-year-old son on holiday.

Kevin Holmes, 28, bundled his victim into the boot of his car, assaulted her and then abandoned her on wasteland.

He drove straight from the scene in Fleetwood, Lancashire, and picked up his three-year-old son for a week's break in Yorkshire.

Holmes, of Crosby, Liverpool, even rang the mother of his child days later to warn that a paedophile was on the loose in the area, Preston Crown Court heard.

Jailed: Kevin Holmes will serve a minimum five year sentence

Jailed: Kevin Holmes will serve a minimum five year sentence

Jailing him indefinitely, Judge Christopher Cornwall said it was an 'utterly appalling case of sexual depravity'.

Holmes was sentenced to serve a minimum of five years for public protection and will not be considered for parole until then.

Holmes acted out his 'grotesque' sexual fantasies with no regard to the 'dark shadow' it would cast over the young girl, the judge said.

Holmes then drove off to a piece of waste ground where he went on to sexually assault her on the afternoon of May 9 last year.

Her 30-minute ordeal ended when he dumped her at the scene and ordered her not to turn around or he would kill her by drowning her in a pond, the court heard.

Judge Cornwall said: 'Ordinary decent members of the community hearing the terrible details of what you did to this girl are likely to react with disbelief that anyone could act with such inhumanity towards a 10-year-old girl.'

Holmes admitted kidnap, assault occasioning actual bodily harm and sexual assault.

He went on trial in December on a further charge of raping the girl but a not guilty verdict was ordered to be returned after the child felt unable to be cross-examined over her trauma.

The girl had left her home for the short walk to a sweet shop after her mother gave her £1.

She left the shop to stroll across to meet her friends in a nearby play area when the chance encounter with the defendant happened.

Holmes stood next to the open boot of his Vauxhall Astra as she passed and he asked her for help which she sensibly refused, prosecutor Richard Haworth said.

'As she tried to walk away she was grabbed and manhandled into the boot of the car,' he said.

'She was in a position of darkness as the defendant got back into the car and it drove off.'

He told the court the car later stopped, Holmes opened the boot and, after assaulting her, told her 'to keep still and asked how old she was.

'In a bid to try and prevent anything further taking place she said she was only eight.'

Holmes then set off for wasteland next to an equestrian centre in Rossall Lane where he parked and then pulled her from the boot into the rear of the vehicle where he sexually assaulted her and then acted indecently in front of her.

His parting shot was to threaten to kill her as he abandoned her where she successfully sought the help of a passer-by and raised the alarm, Mr Haworth said.

Within minutes Holmes was at the home of his ex-partner to pick up his son.

The prosecutor said: 'She says he turned up and appeared to be acting perfectly normal and was even having a laugh with everybody in the house.

'''Kevin told people to kiss our son goodbye and then they both left', she said.'

Holmes later returned from the holiday but not before committing a 'supreme act of deceit' during the break with a phone call to his ex-partner.

'She said Kevin explained that a young girl had been taken from the park and that I had to keep an eye on my son,' he said.

'I assumed he was being a caring dad but during that phone call he implied I was a bad mother and that I let him wander around his own.'

Police undertook an extensive manhunt as DNA traces from the attacker were detected.

Holmes had no previous convictions so was not thought to be on the DNA database but it is understood the sample proved to be a match with a close family member.

When arrested at his home in Liverpool a month later, he told officers: 'I hold my hands up, I can't stay on the run. I've abducted a child and sexually assaulted her.

'I've never done anything like this before.'

The girl showed great courage in providing as much information as she could soon after her ordeal and had provided an 'astonishingly accurate' description of his facial features which was distributed by the police.

She suffered bruising and had undergone a considerable medical examination including tests for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.

In mitigation, Janet Ironfield said Holmes was a man of previous good character who came from a respectable family background.

Written testimonials outlining his character had been submitted from his family, friends and neighbours, and his family continued to support him, she said.

She added that he maintained he had not rehearsed indulging in his sexual fantasy, had never set eyes on the child before and had not pre-planned the attack.

Sentencing, Judge Cornwall said: 'Most decent people will struggle to understand how anyone could entertain such depraved thoughts in the first place but to go beyond the realms of fantasy to make it an act of reality is simply grotesque.

'She had ceased to be a vulnerable child as far as you were concerned.

'She was but a vehicle for you to achieve sexual satisfaction.

'When you took hold of her and put her into the boot of your car you took hold of her whole future life and put it in grave jeopardy.

'In her most heart-rendering victim impact statement, her mother said 'it really frightens me as a mother, how will she end up now, is she going to be different now, how will she cope if she does not speak about it, what is she thinking, how will this affect her?

'Every single one of those questions is pertinent. Each one is asked for one reason only - because of what you (Holmes) did to her.

'What makes all this terrible business even more dreadful is that you had travelled there to pick up your own child child in order to take him on holiday.

'While waiting for the appointment time to collect him you saw this girl and you were completely unable to control this bizarre sexual impulse, did all that you did towards her and picked up your son thereafter as if nothing had happened.'

He concluded: 'The harm you have done remains beyond calculation. You exploited her innocence for your own gratification without giving any thought to the harm you caused her.

'You have cast a very dark shadow over her childhood. No-one at the present time knows how long that shadow will last. This is a terrible burden for her and her parents.'

He said he was satisfied he was 'highly dangerous' and continued to pose a strong risk to under-age children.

The judge stressed he would only be released by the Parole Board if it was content that risk was no longer present.

If released Holmes, of Coney Crescent, would be on licence and could be recalled at any point if he breached its terms, he said.

In a statement, the girl's family said: 'We as a family still find it hard to come to to terms with what has happened to our daughter and will do for a long time, if not for the rest of our lives.

'No matter the sentence today, it will never make this go away.

'What this man did to our little girl is horrific. She or any other child should have been able to feel safe playing around the corner in the park in broad daylight.

'We have to deal with challenges day by day, her innocence has been taken from her by this man's actions but we will be strong and have to get her through this.

'She has changed, there is no doubt, but we have to accept this and carry on as best as we can.

'She is the bravest person we know and we are extremely proud of her.

'I feel no matter what rehabilitation he (Holmes) receives the fact is he will remain an extremely dangerous individual.

'I am already scared that when he is released that he will do this again to another child - that it could be worse for that child.

'We are just glad that he did let our daughter go.

'But knowing what he did and what he is capable of is very frightening.

'We would like to thank everyone for their help, advice and support during this, including Lancashire Police, the doctors at The Safe Centre, even members of the public who came forward offering information which helped lead to the arrest and conviction of this man.'

Outside court, the child's mother said: 'I think it's disgusting that he phoned his former partner knowing that he did it. It is hard to put into words how I feel.'

Detective Superintendent Neil Esseen said it was one of the 'most harrowing cases' he had dealt with in his 25 years of experience in serious crime.

'What he did was reprehensible and, in my mind, bestial,' he said.

'It was a terrible offence and my heart goes out to the girl and her family.'

To read the original article CLICK HERE
'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
To understand the Concept & Services of Stolen????-
where you can help yourself and others: StolenKids-
4 Those losing kids due to 'authorities' ie Forced Adoption & Care!
Or perhaps more suited to YOUR needs: StolenChildhood- 
4 those facing abuse past or present sexual or other!
or StolenTrust-
4 those where or have suffered abuse within a relationship!
or StolenOyster-
4 those who have been abused or raped by a stranger or stalker
To See The Links Page
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, 15 January 2011

15-Jan-2011 - TELEGRAPH - Christopher BOOKER - A Woman's Fall!!

15-Jan-2011 - TELEGRAPH - Christopher BOOKER - A Woman's Fall!!

A mother's fall causes her to lose her child

Christopher Booker
A woman who was temporarily paralysed in a fall had her baby taken into care while she lay in hospital, writes Christopher Booker


Mother and child

Mother and child are often torn apart by our system of child protection Photo: Alamy By Christopher Booker 7:12PM GMT 15 Jan 2011


528 Comments


In recent months, I have reported on many disturbing examples of how our system of “family protection” has gone horribly off the rails, but none is more bizarre than this week’s. As usual, I am legally barred from identifying the mother at the centre of this case or giving many other details, but she is in her mid-thirties, has various academic qualifications and some time back returned to England after 10 years working in America. There, among other things, she had worked as a counsellor in Guantanamo Bay, but what she saw there led her to start a new career as a financial adviser.






In September 2009, after a difficult pregnancy, she gave birth to a daughter, by an old friend with whom marriage was not possible. Two months later, she was sitting on her mother’s windowsill, dressed in a coat and hat ready to go out, when she fell, snatching at a curtain in a vain attempt to save herself.






She woke up in hospital, paralysed from the neck down. Soon afterwards, a nurse handed her a phone. It was a social worker from the local council, to tell her that her daughter – who was being looked after by her sister – was to be placed in care and put up for adoption within six weeks. “I was so paralysed,” she says, “that I couldn’t wipe the tears from my eyes.”






Because she was very fit (having been something of a star athlete), she made a miraculously quick recovery, and was discharged from hospital – after a psychological evaluation which confirmed that her fall was accidental and that she posed no risk to herself or anyone else. Still, in January last year the social workers applied for an interim care order. She was told that this was because her baby was at “potential risk of harm” due to her “suicide attempt”, and that she was in a “violent relationship” – whereas there had been no man in her life for over a year.






The interim order was issued, as is routine, but the social workers were told to produce evidence for their case, and the baby was allowed to remain with the mother’s sister’s family. The mother was given a hair-strand test which, she was startled to be told, showed “traces of cocaine” and “chronic excessive drinking”, though she rarely drinks, and a re-test for cocaine was negative.




In March, another hearing was cancelled because the council’s documentation was not yet available. In April, a case management conference was cancelled because the local authority was “not prepared”. Another hearing was adjourned in May because the council’s paperwork was incomplete, and in June it was cancelled, for the same reason.






The baby was still in the care of her aunt and the mother was allowed regular visits, in the presence of a “contact supervisor”, who was impressed by the happy bonding of mother and daughter. This supervisor was invited by the mother to attend a Family Group Conference, which looked at a pile of her reports provided by the social workers. When the mother queried some of the documents’ dates, particularly one or two which were critical of her, the supervisor insisted, to general surprise, that they weren’t written by her. The social workers were asked to look into how the notes had been “edited” – but the supervisor was suspended from the case and has subsequently been given little work by the council.






In August, an order was made that the baby should be put into foster care, and that no family members other than the mother should see her. (The aunt’s young daughter, who had come to look on the baby as her own little sister, was heartbroken.) In September, the baby was placed in a foster home 35 miles away (making regular visits extremely taxing). A new contact supervisor, however, remained positive about the mother-baby relationship.






In October, an Issue Resolution Hearing was cancelled at short notice when the council’s legal team said it had not been supplied with necessary documents. In December another hearing was cancelled for the same reason. The magistrates then said they wanted the case sent to a county court.






It now seems the next hearing will be in May, 18 months after mother and child were parted. Fortunately, the mother is a bright, determined and organised woman, whose child is the centre of her life. Otherwise, subjected to such treatment, like many parents before her she might long since have cracked.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
To understand the Concept & Services of Stolen????-
where you can help yourself and others: StolenKids-
4 Those losing kids due to 'authorities' ie Forced Adoption & Care!
Or perhaps more suited to YOUR needs: StolenChildhood- 
4 those facing abuse past or present sexual or other!
or StolenTrust-
4 those where or have suffered abuse within a relationship!
or StolenOyster-
4 those who have been abused or raped by a stranger or stalker
To See The Links Page
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 10 January 2011

10-Jan-2011 - Paedophile ring leader Colin BLANCHARD jailed

10-Jan-2011 - Paedophile ring leader Colin BLANCHARD jailed

Paedophile ring leader Colin Blanchard jailed

Blanchard was guilty of "breathtaking depravity", the judge told him Continue reading the main story

The leader of a paedophile ring which sexually abused young children and shared the images has been jailed.

Colin Blanchard, 40, of Rochdale, admitted a string of sex offences. He received an indeterminate sentence, and must spend at least nine years in jail.

Two women were also sentenced. Tracy Lyons, 41, of Portsmouth was jailed for seven years and Tracy Dawber, 44, of Southport, was jailed for four years.

Plymouth nursery worker Vanessa George, 40, was jailed in 2009.

'Warped and wicked'

She received an indeterminate sentence, as did the fifth member of the ring, 40-year-old Angela Allen, of Nottingham. They were given minimum terms of seven years and five years respectively.

Mr Justice Royce, sitting at Bristol Crown Court, said Blanchard was guilty of "breathtaking depravity", and described him as "warped, wicked, dangerous and devious".

Det Con Andrew Piling said the case was disturbing and unique

Prosecutors described all the defendants as being involved in "one of the most sickening paedophile rings this country has seen".

Blanchard, a father-of-one, met the women over the internet and convinced them to sexually assault young children and send him the images.

The ring was broken when a colleague of Blanchard found child sex abuse images on his computer in June 2009 and called police.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
To understand the Concept & Services of Stolen????-
where you can help yourself and others: StolenKids-
4 Those losing kids due to 'authorities' ie Forced Adoption & Care!
Or perhaps more suited to YOUR needs: StolenChildhood- 
4 those facing abuse past or present sexual or other!
or StolenTrust-
4 those where or have suffered abuse within a relationship!
or StolenOyster-
4 those who have been abused or raped by a stranger or stalker
To See The Links Page
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, 21 December 2010

21-Dec-2010 - CATHOLIC POPE SEEMS TO NORMALISE CHILD ABUSE

21-Dec-2010 - CATHOLIC POPE SEEMS TO NORMALISE CHILD ABUSE

Pope’s child porn 'normal' claim sparks outrage among victims


Tuesday, 21 December 2010


The Pope

Victims of clerical sex abuse have reacted furiously to Pope Benedict's claim yesterday that paedophilia wasn't considered an “absolute evil” as recently as the 1970s.


In his traditional Christmas address yesterday to cardinals and officials working in Rome, Pope Benedict XVI also claimed that child pornography was increasingly considered “normal” by society.


“In the 1970s, paedophilia was theorised as something fully in conformity with man and even with children,” the Pope said.


“It was maintained — even within the realm of Catholic theology — that there is no such thing as evil in itself or good in itself. There is only a ‘better than' and a ‘worse than'. Nothing is good or bad in itself.”


The Pope said abuse revelations in 2010 reached “an unimaginable dimension” which brought “humiliation” on the Church.


Asking how abuse exploded within the Church, the Pontiff called on senior clerics “to repair as much as possible the injustices that occurred” and to help victims heal through a better presentation of the Christian message.


“We cannot remain silent about the context of these times in which these events have come to light,” he said, citing the growth of child pornography “that seems in some way to be considered more and more normal by society” he said.


But outraged Dublin victim Andrew Madden last night insisted that child abuse was not considered normal in the company he kept.


Mr Madden accused the Pope of not knowing that child pornography was the viewing of images of children being sexually abused, and should be named as such.


He said: “That is not normal. I don't know what company the Pope has been keeping for the past 50 years.”


Pope Benedict also said sex tourism in the Third World was “threatening an entire generation”.


Angry abuse victims in America last night said that while some Church officials have blamed the liberalism of the 1960s for the Church's sex abuse scandals and cover-up catastrophes, Pope Benedict had come up with a new theory of blaming the 1970s.


“Catholics should be embarrassed to hear their Pope talk again and again about abuse while doing little or nothing to stop it and to mischaracterise this heinous crisis,” said Barbara Blaine, the head of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests,


“It is fundamentally disturbing to watch a brilliant man so conveniently misdiagnose a horrific scandal,” she added.


“The Pope insists on talking about a vague ‘broader context' he can't control, while ignoring the clear ‘broader context' he can influence — the long-standing and unhealthy culture of a rigid, secretive, all-male Church hierarchy fixated on self-preservation at all costs. This is the ‘context’ that matters.”


The latest controversy comes as the German magazine Der Spiegel continues to investigate the Pope's role in allowing a known paedophile priest to work with children in the early 1980s.

To view the original outrageous comments CLICK HERE
'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
To understand the Concept & Services of Stolen????-
where you can help yourself and others: StolenKids-
4 Those losing kids due to 'authorities' ie Forced Adoption & Care!
Or perhaps more suited to YOUR needs: StolenChildhood- 
4 those facing abuse past or present sexual or other!
or StolenTrust-
4 those where or have suffered abuse within a relationship!
or StolenOyster-
4 those who have been abused or raped by a stranger or stalker
To See The Links Page
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, 18 December 2010

18-Dec-2010 - Telegraph - Christopher BOOKER, Cruel Treatment of The Innocent.

18-Dec-2010 - Telegraph - Christopher BOOKER, Cruel Treatment of The Innocent.

Does this family have human rights?
Social workers persist in their cruel treatment of an innocent family,
says Christopher Booker


Mother and child are often torn apart by our system of child protection
Mother and child
Photo: Alamy

By Christopher Booker
7:16PM GMT 18 Dec 2010

Two senior judges of the immigration court rule it illegal, under the Human Rights Act, to deport an asylum seeker who dragged along under his car a dying 12-year-old girl he had run over – because it would be in breach of his right to enjoy “family life” with his children (even though he no longer lives with them).


How strikingly this contrasts with the suffering inflicted on those parents whose five children, as reported here more than once, were snatched from them last April by London social workers, on suspicions which have since, it appears, turned out to be malicious fabrications.


A council whistleblower has said that, at a recent case conference, the social workers admitted that maybe they had made a mistake, and that the mother they had falsely accused was in fact devoted and blameless. But apparently, because of “press interest” in the case, the officials agreed that the council could not afford the very damaging publicity which might follow if the unhappy children were reunited with their parents. It was therefore vital that the council should continue to justify its actions.


The case comes up again in court very soon. In the name of this family’s human rights, it must be hoped that the judge examines the evidence very carefully indeed.

To view the original srticle CLICK HERE

'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
To understand the Concept & Services of Stolen????-
where you can help yourself and others: StolenKids-
4 Those losing kids due to 'authorities' ie Forced Adoption & Care!
Or perhaps more suited to YOUR needs: StolenChildhood- 
4 those facing abuse past or present sexual or other!
or StolenTrust-
4 those where or have suffered abuse within a relationship!
or StolenOyster-
4 those who have been abused or raped by a stranger or stalker
To See The Links Page
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 6 December 2010

06-Dec-2010 - FACEBOOK Campaigns on Abuse TRIVIALISE

06-Dec-2010 - FACEBOOK Campaigns on Abuse TRIVIALISE


Why the Facebook campaign on child abuse is misguided

by Ellie Mae
December 6, 2010 at 11:20 am




Nothing quite brings out my more miserly and rancorous qualities like a Facebook campaign. And the ‘cartoon character’ campaign is no exception.


For those of you yet to have the displeasure, the campaign asks Facebook users to change their profile picture to a cartoon character in order to prevent child abuse. Or raise awareness about child abuse. Or just remind us that ‘abusing kids is bad LOLZ!’


I wasn’t clear on the detail.


In any case, there are two principle reasons for my finding this particular campaign somewhat irksome.


Firstly, I find it irresponsible to promote such an emotive cause without giving any thought as to how that cause is framed. The response to child abuse changes arbitrarily, depending on the contemporaneous narrative of the press.


The usual media response to child abuse stories is to vilify social workers and demand that children are removed from their homes. This response is certain to change the moment the Daily Mail publishes a spurious tale of a child being put into care on superficially ridiculous grounds. Given that these issues can make or break a family unit, and that social workers are under real pressure to respond to whatever the conventional wisdom of the time is, I can’t help recoiling.


It is testament to the hysteria endemic in these types of campaigns that some users have removed their pictures, believing the ‘campaign’ to be hatched by a paedophile ring. What these amorphous paedophiles stand to gain remains unclear; apparently the mere existence of cartoons is now aphrodisiac enough for them.


Secondly, I find these types of campaigns to be both ineffective and misguided. The fact is, the single biggest threat to children at the moment is the imminent and substantial cuts to social service budgets. Social workers are already stretched to their limit: what happens to their ability to help abused children after a grave loss of resources is anybody’s guess.


But instead of trying to resist these measures, hundreds of Facebook users have uploaded a jpg and then patted themselves on the back for a job well done. This type of ineffectual campaigning, in my mind, trivialises genuine efforts to confront issues like child abuse, not least because it encourages people to think that a kitsch gesture is action enough.


True, we are not all tubthumping activists, but there is a middle ground between shutting down Topshop, and a Topcat avatar. A petition to get the issue discussed in parliament, a money-raising drive, or – better yet – sharing information that helps people understand child abuse a little better, would all be more effective than the current effort.


I don’t doubt that those who have changed their pictures are well-intentioned. I also have no issue with social media-based wackiness per se.


But this is a time where taking action against immoral behaviour is imperative. To that end, a campaign that encourages people to believe they can make a change by doing nothing seems incredibly damaging.













To view the original article CLICK HERE

'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
To understand the Concept & Services of Stolen????-
where you can help yourself and others: StolenKids-
4 Those losing kids due to 'authorities' ie Forced Adoption & Care!
Or perhaps more suited to YOUR needs: StolenChildhood- 
4 those facing abuse past or present sexual or other!
or StolenTrust-
4 those where or have suffered abuse within a relationship!
or StolenOyster-
4 those who have been abused or raped by a stranger or stalker
To See The Links Page
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 5 December 2010

05-Dec-2010 - SUNDAY MAIL - Scotland's Fritzl - Not All Abuse is class based!

05-Dec-2010 - SUNDAY MAIL - Scotland's Fritzl - Not All Abuse is class based!


Scotland's Fritzl jailed after keeping daughter hostage for 16 years and making her pregnant six times


Dec 5 2010 Exclusive by Norman Silvester, Sunday Mail
victrim A


INCEST victim Anne-Marie Wilson had a slavemaster and a rapist instead of a father.


Monster dad John Thompson, dubbed Scotland's Josef Fritzl, raped his daughter repeatedly and made her pregnant SIX times over 16 years of merciless abuse.


But now, just days after seeing her tormentor caged for 12 years, Anne-Marie feels she finally has some justice.


She told the Sunday Mail: "I do not regard John Thompson as my father. I do not believe he has any right to be thought of as one.


"He made me a prisoner from a very young age and for much of my life. His abuse and cruelty took away my childhood and teenage years."


But she added: "Knowing that the extent of what he did has been recognised by the court means I can move on and close the door on what happened to me."


Dad-of-eight Thompson, now 65, brutalised his daughter in a calculated campaign to have more children and claim more benefits. He would force her to watch hardcore pornography before raping her.


He got three years and nine months in jail in 2007 for making Anne-Marie pregnant at their Glasgow home in 1995.


After that case, we told Anne-Marie's story and our revelations helped drive a major new police investigation.


And the probe by detectives in West Yorkshire, where Thompson and his family lived in the 1980s, ended last week in three rape convictions and a far longer sentence.


Detective Superintendent Colin Prime, of the West Yorkshire force, said: "This was the worst case of sexual abuse I have seen in 30 years' policing.


"I can only hope Anne-Marie can now find some closure and get on with her life. I hope Thompson is never released."


Anne-Marie, now 40, bravely agreed to make a complaint against her father and saw him jailed at Leeds Crown Court. It was the end of an ordeal that began nearly 30 years ago.


The abuse started in 1981, when the family were living in the Yorkshire city of Bradford.


Thompson, also known as John McMillan, first raped Anne-Marie when she was 11 and made her pregnant at 15. She had the first of four miscarriages she would suffer in her years as her father's sex slave.


In 1988, she had a son, Benjamin, but he was stillborn.


Thompson's abuse of Anne-Marie continued after the family returned to Scotland in the 1990s and she had a daughter, Jennifer, in 1996.


The little girl lived only eight months before dying of a brain condition and Anne-Marie finally broke free of Thompson after the agony of losing her child.


Detectives eventually obtained a DNA sample from Jennifer's post mortem which proved Thompson was her father. It was the key piece of evidence that led to his 2007 conviction and sentence.


But the police had not finished with Thompson. West Yorkshire detectives had suspected for years that he had fathered baby Benjamin and they began to focus on him again as part of a review of unsolved sex crimes.


Mr Prime said: "We became aware of the police investigation in Glasgow and newspaper reports of the case.


"At the time of the original offence in Bradford, Anne-Marie said she did not want to make a complaint. But we always suspected Thompson was the father."


Last year, police proved Thompson's guilt, using DNA from Benjamin's post mortem.


And this time, Anne-Marie was determined to help bring him to justice.


Mr Prime said: "The fact she was now willing to make a complaint, and had spoken openly about her ordeal, was crucial to securing a conviction."


Anne-Marie said: "When West Yorkshire Police told me they had forensic evidence linking Thompson to one of his crimes, I had no hesitation in supporting them during their investigation."


Thompson pled guilty to three counts of raping his daughter and one charge of indecent assault.


He will start serving his new 12-year term after he completes his 2007 sentence. Like Fritzl, he faces the real possibility of dying behind bars.


Fritzl kept his daughter Elisabeth as a sex slave for 24 years in a dungeon under the family home in Austria.


He forced her to give birth to seven of his children and killed one of the babies by refusing to get medical help for him after he was born.
nne-Marie Wilson
To view the original article CLICK HERE

It must be difficult for promoters of the Hollie Greig 'STORIES' to come to terms with the inescapable fact that sexual abuse of children is not all organised by the state, the authorities and convenient cover-up fantasies - there are a huge number of GENUINE cases of sexual abuse with evidence, validity and admissible proof!


'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
To understand the Concept & Services of Stolen????-
where you can help yourself and others: StolenKids-
4 Those losing kids due to 'authorities' ie Forced Adoption & Care!
Or perhaps more suited to YOUR needs: StolenChildhood- 
4 those facing abuse past or present sexual or other!
or StolenTrust-
4 those where or have suffered abuse within a relationship!
or StolenOyster-
4 those who have been abused or raped by a stranger or stalker
To See The Links Page
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, 4 December 2010

04-Dec-2010 - BOOKER - Telegraph - STATE CHILD ABDUCTION

04-Dec-2010 - BOOKER - Telegraph - STATE CHILD ABDUCTION


Child protection: how a cruel council plays its cat-and-mouse game

One distraught family's experience is typical of our warped system of child protection, says Christopher Booker.


Mother and child


Mother and child are often torn apart by our system of child protection Photo: Alamy


Christopher Booker


By Christopher Booker 7:40PM GMT 04 Dec 2010


Last Tuesday I dined in a smart Knightsbridge restaurant with Ian Josephs, who runs the Forced Adoption website, his wife, a mother whom I cannot name and her delightful five-month-old baby, who sat in a high chair perfectly behaved throughout. This was the baby who, shortly after she was born in June, was torn from her mother’s arms in hospital at 3am by six policemen and three social workers. Two months earlier, social workers had also snatched the mother’s five older children, to put them in foster care, costing taxpayers more than £2,000 a week.


On Tuesday afternoon, the mother had been unexpectedly told that she could have contact with two of her children, miles from north London where she lives. Yet again, when she arrived at the contact centre, she was told that the children were not coming, although apparently they long to see her. On returning to the station with her baby, given back to her by the court six weeks ago, she found that all trains had been cancelled because of the snow, forcing her to return to London by taxi at a cost of £50.


This was yet another instalment of a cat and mouse game the council has been playing with the parents for months, telling them they can see their children, only for them frequently to hear, after their long journey, that some or all of the children were not available after all. (It happened again last Friday.)


Months ago the court ordered that the children should be brought back into London, nearer their home. Meanwhile, the council should give the parents a travel voucher, worth more than £30 a time, for their journey. Only once did the council provide a voucher, which the parents discovered on the return journey was one-way only, costing them £100 in penalties.


Since then the court order has been ignored and the parents have had to pay up to £150 a week to see their children, only to be told on arrival that the agreed contact has been cancelled.Meanwhile, the case used to justify the seizing of the children has been collapsing in all directions, although the parents have not once been allowed to challenge the extraordinary statements made about them. Not until next year, 10 months after this family was ruthlessly broken up, will there be a final hearing to decide whether this utterly heartless farce can at last be brought to an end. If and when the facts about this barely credible story can be reported, it will be worthy of the front page.
To view the original article CLICK HERE

Having been involved in many genuine cases like this in support of the parents I can personally vouch for the behaviour they experience.

Consider this case and although it is currently sub judice may I ask you to speculate why the Mother may have had 5 children removed as she is unfit yet is left with the most vulnerable as she is a good Mother.

In the Through The Looking Glass World of Social services and The Family Courts this is hardly a surprise - just as it is no surprise that Tjhe judge changes his mind on whim, alters his own decisions without evidence or reason - accepts an obvious forgery as evidence as it suits the Court's apparant aim to earmark these poor children for adoption yet fail to to supply ANY reason for the children being kidnapped in OUR name as OUR SERVANTS The Courts!

Could it really be that the mother is a Pentacostal Lay Street Preacher - termed by Social Services as a 'Streetwalker'!!!

Our language may have been dumbed down but let us not forget that many devout Christians believe that Mary Magdallen was in fact a prostitute and bore Christs children - there is no rumour of the children being kidnapped by a corrupt State at the time - though to be fair there is no apparent contemporary record of a Rabbi by the name of Jesus being crucified!

It is the secrecy of the system - not to protect the victims of the system but to protect the guilty who abuse the system that leads to such misrepresentations as the 'STORIES' of Anne Greig & her publicist Robert Green being so hard to expose and thus Genuine cases like those reported by the main stream media are demeaned by the fantasy 'STORIES' of the Conspiracy Theorists and the charlatans like David Icke, Brian Gerrish, Robert Green and their ilk - so aiding the corruption that is indubitably an integral part of The Families Division and Social Services as Booker keeps showing.

Our thanks to Ian Josephs for his years of service and commitment in this field helping parents of every class, creed, colour and type to retain the children they so clearly love.

Just exactly what is a perfect parent? Do not forget the attempted suicide of Tony Blair's daughter!

'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
To understand the Concept & Services of Stolen????-
where you can help yourself and others:
StolenKids- 4 Those losing kids due to 'authorities' ie Forced Adoption & Care!
GO TO http://stolenkids-bloggers.blogspot.com/

Or perhaps more suited to YOUR needs:
StolenChildhood- 4 those facing abuse past or present sexual or other!
GO TO http://stolenchildhood-bloggers.blogspot.com/

or StolenTrust- 4 those where or have suffered abuse within a relationship!
GO TO http://StolenTrust-bloggers.blogspot.com/

or StolenOyster- 4 those who have been abused or raped by a stranger or stalker
GO TO http://StolenOyster-bloggers.blogspot.com/

To See The Links Page
Enhanced by Zemanta