ABOUT THE CONCEPT

To understand the Concept & Services of

Stolen????- where you can help yourself and others:

StolenKids- 4 Those losing kids due to 'authorities' ie Forced Adoption & Care!

GO TO http://stolenkids-bloggers.blogspot.com/ Or perhaps more suited to YOUR needs:

StolenChildhood- 4 those facing abuse past or present sexual or other!

GO TO http://stolenchildhood-bloggers.blogspot.com/ or

StolenTrust- 4 those where or have suffered abuse within a relationship!

GO TO http://StolenTrust-bloggers.blogspot.com/
or
StolenOyster- 4 those who have been abused or raped by a stranger or stalker

GO TO http://StolenOyster-bloggers.blogspot.com/

Pages

Showing posts with label Daniel FOGGO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Daniel FOGGO. Show all posts

Sunday, 12 June 2011

12-Jun-2011 - Sunday Times SATANIC ABUSE CLAIMS!

12-Jun-2011 - Sunday Times SATANIC ABUSE CLAIMS!

 Hi,

as so often happens in these situations - shreds of hearsay get built into 'Stories' to be exploited - all too often by charlatans like David Icke, Robert Green and their ilk to build a tissue of lies for their own gain.

The Fantasies and 'STORIES' surrounding Hollie Greig are just such a case as were the abuse claims in Cleveland.

There is a great deal of difference between the exploitation of a disturbed mind and having valid admissible evidence.

You will note that The Journalist in this instance highlights the lack of corroborated evidence - Just as with the 'STORIES' surrounding Hollie Greig which have far more to do with the needs of self importance of Robert Green and a small band of malign followers and the sad problems of Hollie Greig's Mother Anne.

EVIDENCE is the ONLY way forward in such 'STORIES' and without it there is clearly no case.

As has been irrefutably proven CLICK HERE

Satanic abuse claims ‘doomed our girl’
A woman whose death in 2005 remains a mystery had her wild beliefs of abuse nurtured by her doctors, say her family
Daniel Foggo Published: 12 June 2011
Joseph Felstead says he wants answers about how his daughter was treated (Felstead Family)


A family have described how their daughter’s life went into terminal decline after she was treated by psychiatrists and doctors who fostered false beliefs in her mind that she was the victim of satanic abuse.


Carole Myers was treated for 20 years by experts — including a former head of ethics for the British Medical Association (BMA) — yet the family say her deluded claims went unchallenged. She even alleged she had been abused at Conservative Central Office by two former cabinet ministers.


Myers eventually died at 41 in mysterious circumstances. A report by a Scotland Yard officer, Detective Sergeant Grant Lander, stated that he found it “quite incredible” that the satanic abuse claims were taken at face value by experts when they were demonstrably untrue.


Her case has alarming parallels with the satanic abuse cases of the late 1980s and early 1990s in Cleveland, Orkney, Rochdale and Nottingham — where parents were separated from their children on the basis of uncorroborated claims from self-professed victims of ritual exploitation.


Since Carole’s death in 2005, her parents and brothers have pieced together much of her medical history and the murky events surrounding her death.


Carole was registered as mentally ill for the last 13 years of her life, and she first expressed her claims of ritual abuse only after she was given therapy to recover “lost” — in reality, false — memories .


Her family are directing much of their ire at Dr Fleur Fisher, 75, head of ethics at the BMA from 1991 to 1996, who treated Carole for psychological problems in the mid-1980s. As well as referring her to other experts, Fisher, an expert in healthcare ethics, struck up a close friendship with her.


It was Fisher who rang 999 on June 29, 2005, while on a train to Manchester, to ask police to check on Carole’s wellbeing.


An hour and a half later Carole had been pronounced dead. She was found lying naked from the waist down in her flat in Wandsworth, south London, surrounded by medication. Questions remain over how she died, because there were no dangerous levels of drugs in her system.


Fisher began making arrangements for Carole’s cremation. She told police and the coroner’s office that she was Carole’s next of kin, and handed over a document purportedly written by her late patient detailing her childhood history of alleged family abuse.


It claimed Carole had been satanically abused “in every way conceivable or imaginable” by her family, who had supposedly also killed her sister and placed Carole on top of the body; set the family house on fire, and also murdered Carole’s own children by ritual sacrifice. There is no independent evidence that Carole had children.


It is possible that Carole’s account drew on a series of real life family tragedies that took place before she was born. Her fifth brother was stillborn; her baby sister died a natural death from a hole in the heart, and there was also a fire at the family home.


Fisher temporarily took Carole’s car after her death, calling the insurers to tell them she had been her “unofficial daughter” and asking to be insured to drive it so that she could get to her Devon home as the train system was in chaos. Fisher also cleared Carole’s flat of her possessions, giving them to the Salvation Army.


Carole’s family have since obtained a tape recording of a call made by Fisher to the insurers in which she claimed that Carole had been subjected to “brutal family abuse over many years”. When asked what should be done with the £357 refund on the policy, Fisher asked it to be sent to her in order to help pay for Carole’s funeral.


Carole’s father, Joseph Felstead, a 68-year-old retired engineer from Stockport, his wife Joan, and their sons, Kevin, David, Anthony and Richard, heard of her death only when the coroner’s office rang the day before the planned cremation.


They had no inkling of the gathering crisis that had swallowed up Carole over 20 years. “Carole had been a lively, happy child,” said her father. “She qualified as a nurse and then left home and eventually moved south to pursue her career.


“Her contact with the rest of the family became less, perhaps twice a year, but we thought it was because she was so busy.”
To view the original article CLICK HERE

'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
To understand the Concept & Services of Stolen????-
where you can help yourself and others: StolenKids-
4 Those losing kids due to 'authorities' ie Forced Adoption & Care!
Or perhaps more suited to YOUR needs: StolenChildhood- 
4 those facing abuse past or present sexual or other!
or StolenTrust-
4 those where or have suffered abuse within a relationship!
or StolenOyster-
4 those who have been abused or raped by a stranger or stalker
To See The Links Page
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 14 June 2009

SUNDAY TIMES - Daniel FOGGO - 14-Jun-2009

SUNDAY TIMES - Daniel FOGGO - 14-Jun-2009

From The Sunday Times June 14, 2009

More ‘stupid’ mothers prevented from fighting adoptions
Daniel Foggo


A SECOND case has emerged of a woman who has had her children taken away from her and been prevented from objecting because she was judged “too stupid” by the authorities.

Lawyers acting for the 24-year-old from Nottingham, who has had two daughters adopted, say she has since shown herself far brighter than was believed when the original judgment was made.

But it is now too late for her to go back to court for the return of her children.

Last month, The Sunday Times reported a similar case of a mother deemed too unintelligent to care for her child.

New figures show that hundreds of parents have had the official solicitor, currently Alastair Pitblado, imposed.

Since January 2006 his department has been brought in to represent 588 parents deemed to “lack the mental capacity” to instruct lawyers in cases where their children faced the possibility of adoption.

Last month The Sunday Times highlighted the case of Rachel, also a 24-year-old from Nottingham, who is taking her legal challenge to the European Court of Human Rights after her three-year-old daughter was ordered to be adopted because she was ruled not to be intelligent enough to care for her.

In the latest case the mother’s two daughters were both adopted in 2006 after a health worker noticed that her living conditions were unsatisfactory.

Before the case was finalised in court, however, it was decided that the woman lacked the intelligence to instruct her own lawyer, which led to the official solicitor being brought in. A psychologist’s report gave her a low IQ but said her learning disability would improve in time.

The mother insisted that she wanted to keep her girls but the official solicitor said she did not have a case at the time and did not contest the adoptions on her behalf.

Her solicitor, Simon Leach, who runs Nottingham Family Law Associates, said: “I would have liked her to have given evidence, or certainly have someone speak on her behalf, so it could be explained at length why she should keep her children. But the system would not allow it.

“At that time she had little or no understanding of what her children needed but she was very loving of her children and still is.

“But I sat down with her last week and she was using words she could never have used before. It was clear to me that her level of understanding had improved considerably.”

Leach said there were still question marks over whether she would be able to care properly for the girls but since the adoption had already happened the issue could no longer be addressed. “It’s too late now,” he said. He added that his firm had been involved in up to 20 cases in which their clients were handed over to the official solicitor.

The official solicitor typically declines to contest any final care orders.

Leach said this was because the system did not allow the official solicitor to do so.

He said: “I think the official solicitor should be able to put a case. It’s not just about justice, it’s about justice being seen to be done.”


To view the original article CLICK HERE
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 10 May 2009

Sunday Times - Daniel Foggob- 10-May-2009

Sunday Times - Daniel Foggob- 10-May-2009

From The Sunday Times May 10, 2009

Mother denied all access to her children
Daniel Foggo


A COURT has denied the former wife of a rich City financier all access to their three children after she was found to be turning them against him.

In an extraordinary ruling, the woman, who was also judged to be too indulgent a parent, has been legally barred from seeing her children for three years. She was jailed for approaching one of them in the street and telling him she loved him in breach of a court order. She is facing a possible return to jail this summer for posting a video about her plight on the internet.

The woman judge presiding over the case justified banning contact between the mother and her children because they were being placed in “an intolerable situation of conflict of loyalties resulting in them suffering serious emotional harm”.

During supervised visits with her, the children made serious allegations about their father which were later shown to be unfounded. Social workers believed the mother was either prompting them to make the claims or they were saying them just to please her.

A psychiatrist who assessed the case said the mother “loved her children” but had harmed their development by trying to be always “available” to them.

The judge said she had “serious concern about [the mother] infantilising the children, encouraging them to make complaints about the father and encouraging them to want to take an inappropriate part in these proceedings”.

The mother breached an injunction excluding her from her children’s lives by approaching her son in public. She also sent texts to her former husband, including one saying she was sorry. Another said she would do whatever he wanted to get access. She was sentenced to a month in prison.

The case has prompted an outcry from campaigners who want the family courts to be more publicly accountable. Although recent changes have allowed a small number of cases to be reported, most are still conducted in secret.

A spokeswoman for Mothers 4 Justice, a pressure group, said: “When you consider what this woman was put in prison for, it is absolutely appalling. She was put in a jail with murderers and criminals.”

She said she disagreed with punishing a mother for her children making allegations about their father.

Anthony Douglas, chief executive of Cafcass, a body that looks after children’s welfare during court cases, said: “In a small minority of cases, continuing contact with a parent who is determined to continue a relationship battle after separating can cause their child immense long-term emotional harm.

“Ending contact with a parent can help children grow up and move on from events to which they were often only miserable witnesses.”


To view the original article CLICK HERE
Enhanced by Zemanta